logo
Volume 12, Issue 2 (2020)                   ihej 2020, 12(2): 47-81 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

khoshkab S. Presenting a Model for Student Development Issues. ihej 2020; 12 (2) :47-81
URL: http://ihej.ir/article-1-1518-en.html
Tehran University , khoshkab.sh@ut.ac.ir
Abstract:   (3596 Views)
Abstract: This study aimed to provide a multilevel model of student development issues with a qualitative approach, using a systematic review of previous studies and the seven-step meta-combination method of Sandlowski and Barso (2007). For this purpose, to determine the direction of the study, the research question was selected, and then to collect information to answer the research question, by reviewing scientific studies in the field of student, 115 related articles were identified, of which 58 articles a science in accordance with the quality evaluation criteria was selected as a research sample and analyzed. Achieve systematic and meta-review of qualitative findings of selected key resources, enumerate 62 concept codes classified within 15 sub-categories of low quality student lifestyle; Inefficiency of thinking and learning style; Weak research and value creation skills; Weak academic sociability; Deterrent personality traits; Low performance of departments; Low faculty performance; Lack of quality of performance appraisal and monitoring approaches; Inefficiency of financial mechanisms; Weaknesses and limitations in governing and managing affairs; The challenge of professional socialization; Scarcity and inadequacy of scientific-welfare resources; Influence and spread of unscientific orientations; Absence or limited presence of support groups, respectively, in the following 3 main categories of issues; Causes of student development are contextual issues of student development and issues of student development interventions approved by experts in the field of student development using the Kappa agreement coefficient index at three levels: individual, organizational and extra-organizational. Finally, while discussing and concluding and explaining the research achievements based on the relevant theoretical foundations, suggestions were made to improve student development measures.
Full-Text [PDF 1437 kb]   (993 Downloads)    
Type of article: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2020/08/6 | Accepted: 2021/04/5

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.